|
Rockaway Park NY In the 38th Year of the Society Since 1971 "Betwixt and Between" |
||||
The Society has proposed ethical questions:
QUESTION ONE: OBAMA`S WAR SPEECH AT THE PEACE PRIZE On December 8 2009 the day after Pearl Harbor Day, President Barak Hussein Obama of the United States accepted the Nobel Peace Prize vowing in his acceptance speech to continue the war in Afghanistan. Was the award of a peace prize appropriate?
Awesome David Lawrence replies
Question One: No. Although Obama`s decision to continue the war in Afghanistan might indeed lead to eventual peace, the Nobel Peace Prize should not allow the ends to justify the means. It is a pacifistic prize that is often unrealistic. But it`s importance is that it is spiritual and meant to allow no violence, no matter the reason. While the Nobel Peace Prize is a naïve award, it should not include warfare as an antidote to warfare. It is not practical. It should probably be given out by the church rather than Norway. And Obama doesn`t deserve it even though underneath it all he is a pacifist hiding as a warmonger in order to fulfill his election promise that Afghanistan is the right war and that Bush was wrong to fight in Iraq.
The award of the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack "Insane" Obama was not appropriate, but an act of appeasement. Should a Nobel Peace Prize have been given to Hitler, in the hope that he might become a man of peace, if only he received tribute, cash and a medal? Nobel Peace Prizes should go to people who act in the cause of world peace, not to those who merely speak about peace, while waging war illegally. George Santayana said those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Should Nobel Peace Prizes go to morons? President Barack "Insane" Obama has learned nothing from history. Like Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, and various other tyrants who failed to conquer Afghanistan, he has read too many of his own press clippings, listened to too many of his own sermons, and foolishly appointed himself the latest, greatest Messiah. But history has already spoken. Nations like Vietnam and Afghanistan cannot be "conquered" by invaders. They can only be subdued, at best, for brief periods of time. They will always outlast the invader, who lacks commitment and staying power. No matter how many thousands of American troops die in Afghanistan, or how many trillions of American taxpayer dollars are squandered there, the end result will be the same: the Afghani people will decide their own course of action. This is because they live there, and Americans don`t. Barack "Insane" Obama is just another political creature (i.e., a charismatic moron who`s good at getting elected). If he really was the "smartest man in the room," he would study history, then get our troops and money out of Afghanistan and Iraq at lightspeed. – Michael R. Burch
Nobel Committee metaphorically inducts rookie into Hall of Fame after first incomplete inning
O Tempora O Mores...
If Obama were a leader with grace and dignity, he should have refused the undeserved prize
HAIKU, Maui, Oct 11 - "O tempora o mores" is the famous sentence uttered by one of Rome`s greatest orators, philosophers and statesmen, Cicero (106BC-43BC). Cicero used it in 63BC, when he was the Consul of Rome, as he denounced the corrupt Senator Cataline. More than two millennia later, Cicero`s "oh the times, oh the customs"-cry for fairness and decency still echoes.
We were reminded of it after the decision of the Nobel Committee to award its Peace Prize to the American president Obama. For, the decision has about as much merit as inducting a rookie pitcher into the Hall of Fame after his first incomplete inning. Or awarding an Olympic gold medal to a marathon runner after the first 270 yards of the race.
An exaggeration? Actually, maybe even an understatement. For, this Nobel laureate won his award on the basis of a nine-day track record. (Nominations for the Nobel Prize reportedly closed only nine days after Obama`s inauguration ceremony).
Anyone with a sense of fairness and decency, regardless of his/her political persuasion, nationality or race, should be shocked to learn that someone with no tangible results would receive such a "prestigious" reward. Obama himself was quoted as saying that he was "surprised" and "humbled." And he donated the $1.4 million cash prize to charity, sources say.
Actually, if this American President were a true leader with grace and dignity, someone who leads by example not just empty rhetoric, he should have refused the undeserved award. As it were, he accepted it. Which not only cheapens the Nobel Prize itself, but it opens Obama to widespread ridicule, both at home and abroad. In turn, this will make his job more difficult in the future.
After the first nine months in office, this Nobel Prize "Peacenik" is still fighting two overseas wars he said he would end, not to mention allowing scores of "black ops" around the world to continue. And he seems on the verge of escalating our troop deployment in Afghanistan.
No surprise there, of course. It took less than three months for President Obama to reverse himself on more of his campaign promises than you can shake a stick at. And it took only six months for the awake among the American public to see that the U.S. presidential elections are no more than a very expensive "Demo Farce," as I wrote in a Washington Times column in Nov 1996 (see "Demo Farce and the American Century," Nov 1996).
When it comes to politicians, one must watch what they do, not what they say. "Read my lips; no new taxes" (a famous line uttered by Bush Sr in 1988) was also a decoy statement. Once Bush became president, he raised taxes in order to reduce the budget deficit.
"Words are cheap; action speaks louder that words," is another old adage. And Obama`s moves since taking office have shown that he is no different than Bush Jr. Or Clinton. Or Bush Sr. Four years from now, what`s left of the world after 2012 will be able to see in stark colors how ridiculous and meaningless this Nobel Peace Farce was (see 2012: Toward a New Breed of Man, Jan 2009).
By the way, this is not the first time the Nobel Committee embarrassed itself in the 113-year history of the Peace Prize. Hitler was nominated for it in 1939. Stalin and Mussolini have also been proposed, among some famous "peacemakers." And Henry Kissinger actually won it while the Vietnam war was still raging on. So did Yasser Arafat and Mikhael Gorbachev.
On the other hand, peacemaking giants, such as Mahatma Gandhi, were never even nominated. Guess the British Empire was still too powerful back then.
In short, unlike the scientific Nobel Prize awards which are based on merit and actual achievements, the Peace Prize is evidently a political football. It has little to do with peace and much more with appeasing the powers that be. Peace? It`s what politicians promise before sending soldiers into battle.
"I`m not sure I understand -- this isn`t for peace here, is it?" Homaira Reza, an Afghan bank teller from Kabul told a Los Angeles Times reporter. "Because we haven`t got any."
Neither do the Iraqis. Nor the Palestinians. Nor the Israelis. Nor do we in America, a country that is increasingly becoming a police state. I am not sure if even the Nobel Committee know what it was for. For laughs, perhaps?
Obama should have refused the Nobel Peace Farce until such time he delivered real peace and not just promises. As it turns out, by accepting it, the American President has become the main character in a farce. Not a promising career start for a great leader.
Oh well... there`s always the World Series to distract a disheartened nation`s attention from global affairs. Panem et circences... (Latin... see the "PS" below).
---
Bob Djurdjevic is a writer and consultant based in Haiku (Maui), Hawaii. He is a free thinking humanist.
Which means he is neither a Republican nor a Democrat. You can find more of his research and columns at
Truth In Media
The Letter follows:
I am a liberal and proud of it. Yet, I have been reading Fullosia Press for some time. While I can not agree with most of what is written there,
I am cheered that The Society did not engage in Bush – worship during the eight long years of his over-lordship.
I did detect a certain coolness to President Barack Hussein Obama that deviated from the general euphoria which accompanied his election.
However this coolness does not devolve into the ridicule of right wing talk show, those disgusting "30 minute hates."
Now we come to the Nobel Prize for Peace generously awarded to our dear President. The Society in its 911 issue of FP merely asks "for what?"
This is a far less extreme position than that taken elsewhere on the right wing.
I am disturbed by reports that The Society intends to issue a Modest Proposal to grant President Obama the Baseball MVP award
as well as the Congressional Medal of Honor and to induct President Obama into Le Temple de la renommée du hockey
(The Canadian Hockey Hall of Fame) on the same criterion by which he received the Nobel Peace Prize.
I can not say I wholly approve.
The right wing must come to grips with the [Afro-American] Presidency. When I looked at the glow in the faces of the little [Afro-American] school children
watching the president`s televised greetings on the opening day of school, I saw the importance of President Barack Hussein Obama as a role model,
an example to be followed to encourage little [Afro-American children] to pursue greater heights and attain higher goals.
The advent of the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama was the most significant event in US history next to
[Afro-American] Emancipation and [Afro-American] suffrage. Given the long history of oppression of the [Afro-American] race, slavery,
colonisation and neo-colonialism, one cannot judge President Barack Hussein Obama by the same standards as white men.
Sincerely
Carefully taught biased hatred and deeply ingrained collective fear are sizzler brands of herd instinct which stampede animosity toward those not considered part of the herd. Negative perceptions breed contempt for others as well as ourselves. A self-respecting positive energy consciousness will enable us to become as accepting of our neighbor`s shortcomings as we are of our own.
The aims of multiversity involve freely sharing information and facts; advancing theoretical wisdom and practical know-how; disseminating verifiable truths via logical reasoning; as well as cooperatively and collectively solving socio-cultural hostile misunderstandings and problematic enigmas. Our global family must appreciate individual differences, wants, desires and needs related to basic humanistic values – fairness, compassion, kindness, patience, dignity and generosity. If applied correctly, education can actually lead to learning something.
Free-thinking tolerance and good-humored flexibility are required for open hearts and minds to better comprehend each other`s beliefs, traditions, practices, behaviors and habits without necessarily sharing or accepting them. World peace means living together with mutual tolerance, mutual understanding and mutual respect.
Dr. Charles Frederickson
|
QUESTION TWO: Mr Mallik Hassan
On November 5 2009, a week short of Veterans Day, Mr Malik Hasan, purportedly a Major in The US Army Medical Corps opened fire on Army Personnel deploying for the war zone. Reports in the Establishment Press reveal that Mr Hasan was deeply disaffected by the President Barak Hussein Obama`s vow to continue the war. The incident followed by days President Barak Hussein Obama`s declaration that Mouslems inside the United States should not be given extraordinary attention. Leading up to the incident, Mr Hasan, an alleged psychiatrist, was reputedly counseling soldiers returning from the war zone and engaging in frequent arguments with colleagues over war crimes committed in the US cause. Official US propaganda posits that Mouslem is a religion of peace welcomed in the United States. What impact will Mr Hasan`s actions have on the official line? David Lawrence: MORE THAN POLITICAL CORRRECTNESS Major Hasan kills thirteen people at Ft. Hood and the mainstream media calls it an act of insanity rather than jihad. We call this political correctness on the part of the media. But it is something more than political correctness. It is society`s effeminate desire to identify with the enemy and empathize with his positions. This is a throwback to the sixties when feminism became chic and the masculine white male was swept into the dust heap. This is the self-hatred of women caught between their feminine and masculine identities. Empathy has become self-destruction. It is inverse Darwinism, survival of the weakest, the desire to let evil conquer good. Political correctness has morphed into societal destruction. It is led by female thanatos and the masochistic desire of society to be raped. It takes courage to call a spade a spade, to denounce your enemy for what he is-in this case, Major Hasan, a Moslem fanatic who also happens to be warped. The media doesn`t like to be direct and honest; it is afraid of repercussions, it is afraid of the sound of truth. Hasan is not a criminal. He is a Moslem soldier in the war against western civilization. He does not deserve a trial and twenty years of appeals on death row. He should be killed instantly. He is in the battlefield of jihad and if we don`t shoot back, even while he`s in the hospital, we are cowards who besmirch innocent victims, insulting and not backing up the dead. War is designed to shoot enemy soldiers. Hasan is an enemy soldier. There are no trials on the battlefield. Political correctness is not a cute little term. It is sanctioning treason, ignoring our dead and celebrating our enemies. It is a form of effeminate suicide; it is the pain of birth in the womb while resulting in the death of its victims. To forgive is to forget. Terrorists must be remembered if only to stop subsequent horrors. Calling Hasan a nut rather than a terrorist is to cancel out the lessons of history. When are we going to stop calling terror by other names? When are we going to stand up against the Moslem plague? When are we going to stop history from repeating itself? Fritz Hamilton: Well, what you expect? Hassan`s an Army shrink where the norm is to be mad/ they train you to be mad so you can kill & feel good about it/ Hassan is a Muslim man of peace who never should have been in the U.S. Army, & once in, he showed every reason to be out/ he doesn`t believe in our wars in Iraq & Afghanistan/ he thinks killing other Muslims evil & tells everyone about it/ he tries to contact Al Qaeda to express his support/ just the right man for us to deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan, & he receives his orders that he`s about to go; so are we surprised that he flips & shoots down l3 in Ft Hood & wounds 38 more as an expression of his insanity & a prostest against are own? Yes, we are surprised because the Army at Ft Hood is incredibly dense/ how can a nice, quiet guy like Hassan do such a thing? He telegraphed everything he might do to hundreds, tried to get help before he did it/ Hassan also tried to give help - but to the Islam Mideast! Are we to pretend this couldn`t happen? Well it did! Welcome to the real world, America/ welcome, welcome ... !
Bob Djurdjevic responded: Nothing new there, John. Look at Saddam Hussein or Bin Laden. First we create a monster, then we fight it. You should also read my 1999-piece WASHINGTON`S CRISIS FACTORY, written before the Kosovo war. You can see why the New World Order`s self-appointed "elite" need crises and wars to justify their control over the population. To do that, they need both the mechanical and civil engineers. As I`ve also written before, that`s because the mechanical engineers build the weapons. Civil engineers build the target. And so it goes, over and over again. As you said quoting King Solomon from 4,000 years ago, "there is nothing new under the sun." So why bother repeating it over and over again in articles?
Je`free: Catfight We are from the same family Of fast kill pussycats- You, the puma; I, the cheetah, Strutting together on a catwalk world, Sharing and purrrfecting schemes, And survival tactics in this life Of cat-and-mouse chase And in this declaration of war, None of us is a scaredy-cat On a hot tin roof Meow! We are from the same alley Of scrap-scavengers and ferocity- You, the lion; I, the tiger, Scratching each other`s back With feline paws, warming each other With our black fur of bad luck And in this declaration of war, None of us is backing out, With each of us having 9 lives, Roar! We are each other`s copycat, Wearing the same charming cat`s eyes,, Kitty whiskers, leopard prints In the dead of night, We wake up from our catnap, Testing if our curiosity will kill us, And in this declaration of war, None of us is catatonic Both are just about ready to strike Catfight!
ANDY MARTIN:
Andy Martin says Barack Obama is seeking to cover-up the FortHood massacre because of Obama`s own Muslim family roots
Martin backs Senator Joe Lieberman`s Fort Hood investigation, says the Army is failing to get at the truth, seeking to shield the facts
"Why is the massacre reporting better in a London newspaper, than in U. S. newspapers?" Martin asks.
(CHICAGO)(November 9, 2009) Republican U. S. Senate candidate and insurgent "Internet Powerhouse" Andy Martin will hold a Chicago news conference Monday, November 9th to accuse President Barack Obama of orchestrating a cover-up of the FortHood massacre to cover-up Obama`s embarrassment because of his Muslim overtures and Muslim family background.
Martin backs an independent investigation of the FortHood terrorist attack.
Martin was in Baghdad in 2003 and has traveled widely through the Middle East and Afghanistan for forty years.
"I am amazed at the way the Obama administration and the U. S. Army are trying to cover-up the investigation," Martin will state. "In fact, in the name of avoiding an `anti-Muslim backlash,` the Army and proto-Muslim Mr. Obama are creating an anti-Muslim backlash. Theirs is a self-defeating approach.
"We know all Muslims are not anti-American. But we need to identify the small number that harbor extremist tendencies to protect the millions of peaceful practitioners. If we refuse to hunt down the bad apples, we endanger the entire orchard. That`s what happened with Hasan. We can`t allow it to happen again.
"It is time for Barry Obama to allow an independent and impartial investigation of Hasan`s terrorist attack.
"It is pathetic that we can obtain more accurate/factual reporting in London than we can here in the United States:
"U. S. media have been intimidated by the Obama administration from reporting the truth and digging for the facts. All we get is pro-Obama propaganda from Obama`s media megaphones.
"The claim that a `deployment` triggered Hasan`s mass murder is nonsense. There is overwhelming evidence that Hasan had previously become an enemy of the American people.
"As a military and Middle East expert I am troubled by the lackadaisical response to Hasan`s history of unstable behavior.
"There was embarrassing failure of internal Army investigative units to evaluate Hasan before he launched his one-man war. There appears to have been a failure at the FBI as well. Obama & Co. are calling for `patience` while they cover up their own incompetence.
"Unfortunately, I do not trust Barack Obama to investigate terrorists inside the United States. He has undermined the `war against terror` and corroded our national security with political correctness. His war against Fox News is a war against the unpleasant truths he wants us to ignore.
"Hasan manifested anti-American attitudes for a long time. His violent, oppositional ideation was a threat for an extended period. Why did no one notice? Reports and warnings were ignored. For fear of invoking Obama`s wrath and violating political correctness? Is `fear of Obama retaliation` compromising our national defense and intelligence capabilities?
"The FortHood massacre is a bitter pill for me, because I support Palestinian rights. That a member of a Palestinian family would attack this nation is sad. But I would never allow my personal feelings to get in the way of the truth or the facts. Protecting our men and women in uniform from fanatics and terrorists must come first, last and always.
"Hasan was obviously a terrorist, whether he was ignited by outsiders or acted on his own. The `act` does not become less `terrorist` merely because it is committed by one person.
"If we do not stop the Obama/Army game of `pretend,` the ultimate anti-Muslim backlash will be worse, not better. The Army should be leading the search for truth, not impeding an expedited inquiry and seeking to shield Hasan`s actions and prior history from searching inquiry.
"I don`t know whether to call Joe Lieberman a Democrat or a `Republican` or what. But Lieberman is a loyal American and I salute him for that. As a U. S. Senate candidate I am completely committed to a nonpartisan foreign policy that puts America first and politics last.
"Sadly, Obama is putting his proto-Muslim family history ahead of our national security. I am not surprised. Obama has been excessively solicitous to Muslims. It is time for Mr. Obama to put America first or move out of the White House.
"The military also needs to reassess its internal security procedures and scrape away any political correctness or `fear of Obama.` Too many of our men and women in uniform have recently died at the hands of so-called `one-man` killing sprees motivated by religious extremists.
John Starrs replied:
John Starrs.
David Lawrence:
Well, here it goes again, a Moslem killing innocent people, screaming "Allahu Akbar." His name is Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. He stands for another million homicides waiting to happen.
And the liberals want to pretend that these killings are not religiously motivated. They can`t face facts because it would force them to look at their forgiving positions and realize that they are wrong. It is not politically correct to see reality as it is.
Some of the ignorati even think that these killings are stress related, that Hasan suffers from traumatic war anxiety even though he has never been to war.
He is the typical tortured psychiatrist. A madman who hides behind the sheep`s clothing of helping others.
How many more people have to die at the hands of theocratic, Moslem lunatics before the borders shut down? Moslems should be confined to their own Moslem countries. I am sick of them killing women and children in Madrid, London, New York, Bali, etc., ad infinitum.
Give them the right to return to their own lands. Buy them plane tickets instead of giving them visas. Get them out of here.
But you say, not all Moslems are bad. Not all Nazis were bad either. Some just got swept up in it. In fact a lot of Moslems were Nazis, even Arafat`s uncle Al-Husseinie.
And when there are 1.8 billion Moslems in the world how are we to police the ten per cent who are murderous, who admire suicide bombers? That`s 180.000.000 potential suicide bombers amongst us. That`s more than half the population of the United States.
Send them home to their Mid-east enclaves. Let their people go home to the promise of their lands-death and seventy-two virgins.
Never have such violent people existed. The Koran is filled with murder and executions. Allah looks favorably on killing gays, apostates and women who show their faces.
They call murdering your daughter an honor killing. What honor in family genocide?
Killings are not typical in other cultures. They are in the Moslem culture. Send them home. They do not contribute enough to our culture to make it worth the risk of keeping them here. In fact, if you look scientifically, artistically or culturally, they have contributed nothing to the modern world. They are an embarrassment of violence. Let them embarrass themselves further by blowing themselves us in their own countries.
A funeral for those killed by Hasan is not a place for an anti-militarite like Obama to speak. If he had any integrity or sense of self he would not have been there. It was disingenuous for him to fake being pro military when he is so obviously against the army.
It is completely narcissistic to not look at himself through others` eyes as a poseur.
I couldn`t have done it. I couldn`t have blessed the dead knowing that I was a faker, a phony, a man like John Kerry who consistently disliked and denounced the military. I couldn`t have accepted the title, "Commander in Chief" when I was an antagonist of the army and a naïve believer in pacifism.
I would have had one of my generals speak. I would not have insulted the dead by pretending I was part of their soldierly brotherhood. I would not have disguised myself as a mourner when I was such an obvious antagonist.
|
Question 2: con`t
Dr James Davies Lord Woodburry, Mentor of the Society replied in Mentorial: Greetings Dean Greetings: I did enjoy the recent mathematical sessions of The Society in which I was privileged to be invited and to take part. I thank the Dean not only for the bestowal of the anual Rene Descartes Beleaguered Philosopher Award but also for the new title of August and Distinguished Professor of Mathematics an honor I do not feel I entirely deserve. I study mathematics for its dispassionate logic and unerring conclusions leaving no room for debate in the pursuit of the one true and beautiful. Naturally we would hope to employ the logic of mathematics to the pursuit of political solutions. The Dean has often cautioned me against sweeping social, political and historical conclusions based upon sidebars in mathematical texts and a smattering of anecdotal information as I did recently when I concluded that Turkey had religious freedom based upon the secular nature of the state. How was I to know of the Greco-Turkish war of 1919 - 1922 or the exchange of populations? What was its importance in the scheme of things? I do note that Modern Turkey is now 99% Mouslem, a secular state without the need for a state religion because there is no minority religion.
This shall not stay me from offering my opinion on the Major Malik Hassan incident. Bye the bye Dean is a Major a field grade officer? Generals are of course flag grade officers; colonels they would be field grade; but what about Majors, are they field grade?
Let us see Captain and Lieutenant, now they are company grade officers, aren`t they? You were the officer, a Captain no less, I was only enlisted and I was
taught to salute or sweep it up depending on whether it moved.
However using the device of Occam`s razor, I conclude that the simplest conclusion is the best: That Major Hassan or as the Society calls him Mr Hassan, a purported Major in the US Army Medical Corps, was simply nuts.
I rebel against the suggestion made byAwesome David Lawrence that Mouslems are genetically predisposed to violence. Originally when I read
Mr Lawrence`s remarks I would have attributed them to the Dean. I fear the Dean`s views are not far off and the Dean regards all Islam as his enemy. I am inclined to hold toward the official view
that the US is the great and the only superpower capable of combining with those inclined to be amiable and pliable in the Islamic world and of dealing
with those most harshly who are not.
On that note The Mentor bids the Dean a Most Cheery Cherio Frank De Canio: Approaching Port This schooner`s getting tedious to steer. But even though my briny hands still clutch the tiller firmly, making it appear I`m in control, it took no sailor`s touch to navigate across the narrow shoal. What option here to choose another course or ply deep waters with some earnest goal in mind? I move as though propelled by force before a summons I can plainly hear near shores emerging ominously stark. I recognize with unaccustomed fear, as my ship lists, that soon I`ll disembark in cold, uncharted regions, so bereft, not even murmurs of the sea are left. The Dean replied to the Mentor in His New Years Eve Address: The Dean`s Speech: Bitter Irony The Chair: The Society will come to order. Regretfully the Mentor has chosen once again to extend remarks. Please be brief as the proper place for the Mentor to extend remarks is the Mentorial. The Mentor: Ah yes Chair and thank you for allowing me to extend remarks. There are many areas of disagreement between Dean and Mentor and I think the biggest source is hope. The Mentor still searches for the magic arrow that will set everything aright. Despite the dreary auguries of the Dean and the sing song warnings of the Indian money vendors, the Mentor accepts the Official view that the US will outlast Terrorism as it did Nazism and Communism. On the former, the Dean asserts that the US had the advantage of remoteness and a good leader; with regard to the latter the Dean states that the only thing that kept the US afloat was that the Reds stumbled first. Perhaps I conclude we needed the Reds to keep our system afloat. The Chair: Thank you Mentor for your remarks. Dean pray proceed uninterrupted we hope. The Dean: Greetings Lords President, Honorable Gentlemen and fellow Fullosians. The Society prides itself as the Mentor has stated on applying the logic of mathematics and the dispassion of science to political solutions. And of course since 9 - 11 we have lived not so much in terror of a second Arab attack as we have in irony. First Cowardice became courage. Beginning with 9 - 11, we saw the US President called the voice of courage when he slinked off into hiding from an attack that was already over, but not before he left the sixth great lake on the floor of a Florida classrom. Flags went up but enlistments went down. It is not to far from that to stretch war into peace with a war declaration by his legitimately elected successor delivered on the occasion of the Award of The Nobel Prize for Peace. Then beginning with the patriot act, we abolished civil rights. In the interest of avoiding offence to the likely problem, the Mouslem immigrants we have the government spying on everybody. Thus to preserve the sensabilities of foreigners unwelcome in many quarters, we have the government spying on the peaceful American who has nothing to do with the terrorists. And somehow this made sense abolishing civil rights in order to preserve them to the neo-cons surrounding the Voice of Courage. Next our official propaganda was that Islam was a religion of peace. Even the Kuwaiti prince acknowledged in an interview in the documentary The World Without US that it is not and that the Middle East is the most volitile place on the face of the planet. Yet we had people, both paid US disinformation agents and fools ready to bandwagon their way along, going around selling the line. We were also under the former Bush regime spending money to support gay and lesbian movements and feminism in Islam. The result of that policy was some horrific acts of violence when US forces were forced to pull out of Iraki cities. However the stated aim was to make Islam a democracy. Our means were bombings and war crimes. I`m pretty sure the people the bombs fell on realised that we were not their friends, despite all the propaganda. Yet The US media stands agape when Mr Malik Hussan, a purported Major in The US Army Medical Corps mows down US soldiers, mostly officers and mostly medical personel. The Society tells you that the attack was forseeable and avertable. The illogic rests upon a simple fallacy dealing with the nature of war. Caeaser said never to take advice from an enemy. I doubt he`d approve of handing an enemy a weapon. If give your enemy a weapon, how can you be surprised when he turns it on you? Why would that surprise anyone? How could the Media ask a person of education and status pursue such a course?Sun Tsu said know yourself and understand your limitations. He also said know your enemy. Thus the US enemy is willing to forgo staus and rank to get even. Look at the Mouslem Doctors who attacked Glascow Airport in their shiny SUVs. From that you could have surmised that you can`t buy them off with money and status. It is not hard to see how rank and oaths would not deter the purported Major Mr Hassan. You can trust your enemy to be your enemy. It's that simple. Yet in the merry lunacy the solution the US Army picks is to put more Mouslems in the US Army. We live in the shaddow of the fall of the Great "Universal Empire of Greece and Rome" upon which to one extent or another the US and the UK were modeled on. I have spent many years studying the fall of Constantanople in 1453 and analyzing its causes. High Among the most significant reasons were the failure to understand the bond of Islam. BOSACKER: OCCUPATION BLUES When we unseat a Muslim theocracy, and force a democratic election it will not produce a democracy, or limit subsequent insurrection! New Muslim terrorists, inspired to die, are recruited from subjugated groups the naive occupiers can't identify, while they innocently smile at troops. Our new government we dare not blame, for policing force with tactful restraint. We cannot brand the bombers with shame since each terrorist is someone's saint. Awesome David Lawrence replied: Question Two: It will have no impact. The liberals still think that Mr. Hasan was not a terrorist but a mentally ill person. The right wing knows that he is a terrorist but they can’t get past the liberal correctness of Obama’s self-destructive government. Even George Bush announced that Mouselm is a religion of peace. The fools will continue to believe that while we continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Moslems. It will take far more than killing some soldiers at Fort Hood; after all, the left wing doesn’t even care about soldiers lives and would rather see them dead to save the poor mistreated Moslems. It will take a nuclear bomb in New York City to get our weak populace together to realize that we are being destroyed by the Moslems. That was the spirit we had after 9/11 – for a few days. Frank De Canio: Cuckoo Clock If life begins its run at one o'clock and youth gets settled in a quarter after, adulthood takes in stride its bold tick-tock a happy half-turn from birth's gurgling laughter. Nor need we care or otherwise take stock of any here or there, or hereinafter, or fear the cuckoo down the line will shock us with its coming hour's burgling laughter. But when the small hand noses toward the two, we cease to weave the yarn that time has spun and starkly mark the ticking left to do before the ticker tells us that it's done. As we complete our course around the clock its big hand hails us with the cuckoo's mock.
ANDY MARTIN:
(CHICAGO)(December 30, 2009) Republican U. S. Senate candidate and insurgent "Internet Powerhouse" Andy Martin will hold a dramatic Chicago news conference Wednesday, December 30th to attack President Barack Obama for endangering the lives of every American. "The greatest threat to American national security is sitting in the White House, in the Oval Office," Martin will charge.
"Al-Qaeda is a threat. Yemen is a threat. There are threats in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Somalia represents a problem.
"But the greatest threat of all to our nation is Barack Obama himself. His coddling of Muslims and his degrading of our national security capabilities endangers every American. Obama is trying to blunt the reality that his relentless political correctness and international groveling is encouraging new terrorist threats.
"Obama became president without ever being vetted by any national security agency. Obama`s mysterious journey to Pakistan as a `student` becomes more intriguing every day. Who paid? How did he get there? Whom did he meet with? Obama won`t say. Yet he brags his mother was on welfare. Did he use food stamps to pay for his ticket? Obama`s silence breeds suspicion. There is no way Obama`s opaque personal history would qualify him for any U.S. Government security clearance.
"Obama is mentally incapable of cracking down on Muslims. His mother raised him as a Muslim until the age of 10. He boasted of his Muslim roots in his Cairo speech. His law school education was apparently financed by some of the same Saudi extremists who were paymasters for Al-Qaeda and 9/11.
"I do not trust Barack Obama. Not for one inch, not for one minute.
"We must adopt the Israeli approach to national security and direct our efforts at pre-profiled terrorists and extremists. Illinois `grannies` are not the threat. Islamic anarchists are.
"As Illinois` U. S. Senator I will immediately become Barack Obama`s most formidable opponent, and the most influential advocate of enhanced national security. I have forty years of international experience to recognize a growing risk when I see one. That`s why I believe Obama is the greatest threat to our national security. His actions encourage Islamic anarchists.
"In closing, let me say this is a painful day for me. I am a strong supporter of civil liberties. I am deeply troubled that many innocent people may be inconvenienced or embarrassed by the necessity to enhance national security screening. I have the utmost respect for Islam and every Muslim, and many of my Muslim friends will be disappointed by my advocacy of the need for profiling. But my efforts on behalf of Middle East peace continue. Our national security is enhanced when we stand for peace and justice everywhere in the world.
"Without national security, however, there is no `state` to protect civil liberties. We cannot allow Islamic anarchists to threaten global peace and security. I believe my oath to defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic means just that, however unfortunate the consequences for innocent persons who are affected. I pray the need for the emergency measures will be a brief one."
| |||
|
|||||